Dissertations-Online.com review

the worst writer

The grammer is very poor, obviously english is not their first language. there are no in text citations for references, I asked them to use the course material to make direct course connections and this was NOT done.

I’m not satisfied

The work is ok. But it was uploaded after 12 hours after my due date, and 20 hours after the date I set here, went offline and no response.

I Was Afraid The Writer Would No Finish In Time. Too Many Delays, but plagarism was 0% which is good

The writer was very quick with the task, and it looked as if everything was fine. But by taking a closer look to the text, I noticed that most of the references are kinda irrelevant to the sentence the writer was writing about, and seemed kinda random. Some of the facts I checked were completely false from scientific point of view, and the structure was lacking.

Very bad writing

She didn't write the paper in the way it supposed to be. also didn't answer the questions and requirements.

Didn't care for the paper.

Got a B- on it. Pretty average paper.

I said no further sources needed. It was only a summary of a video. And now I ended up again with poor writing. This is not good.

Just look at the video and you will know that is require with the document (lab3)

not exactly how i wanted it to be answered. it shows page two and three but not one... whatever i guess

This writer use the wrong readings, low quality work and totally waste my time.

It is all wrong!! it should be artworks not these objects and only from a specific period of time! not from the bc era... the whole thing is wrong!! please no...

totally different from what i wanted

if she didnt have the book she shouldnt have asked to write my paper my normal person doesnt so now i have to find someone else short notice. uhg. its my fault for giving her a chance.

The aim of your paper that you have to write for the course is not clear. what exactly is your research question? Weaknesses and strengths (methodological issues) of the articles have not been discussed. Sources 3 and 4 are not scholarly. For annotated bibliography you had to choose five scholarly sources.

Terrrible, not at all what I wanted

Paper not formatted correctly and it was just duplicated over and over to reach the amount of pages needed.