ProfessionalLetterWriting.net review

Unable to complete before the deadline.

It was not as requested in the description and instruction, writer was not following the guid lines what was mentioned.

Only got 58/100, here is the feedback from TA.Mastery. (28/40) Clarity, care, and detail. (20/40) Writing. (10/20) Mastery: What do you mean by Popper's attempt is 'full of skepticism'. Also not sure where the notion of falsification is discussed - 'extrapolating experiences to other conditions' seems like induction. Clarity: Lots of unnecessary detail in here that dilute your argument - for instance, causation discussion not needed.

didn't understand the instruction first but he did it finally

The writer did not meet the deadline on time; it was hard trying to communicating the writer because the writer was never online until 5-10 mins till the deadline, which really made me hesitant & worry. After the deadline, the writer attempt to make change, but the change is not format as it is in the provided infos. Overall, there was not enough quotes, explanations and details being used.

Requested abstract for the beginning of my paper and it wasn't included.

Please don't add him as my writer

Work was completed as promised. Wish we had more time to interact more with each other on completed work.

Did not follow instructions which were very clear and concise was late and I still had to pay for this whole paper very disappointing when I dressed the issue on speaker notes I sent that link how to do it she states to me she knows I do it so if you knew how to do it why didn't you follow the directions for the beginning I don't need the disrespect

work is not good, did not spend time on research...

bidder wanted me to add more pages to complete an assignment that they said they could do.

your work on the second question dose not meet my requirements. As you can see from the model answer I gave you in the file "question_2 instructions" the writer dose not go deeply as you did. The purpose of this question is not to talk about how to design or manufacture SoC!! It is about how to use the reliability tools and techniques to build a sustain reliability plan for SoC. You need to read carefully the model answers then do required changes on question 2.

The writing was full of mistakes and the essay was quite off the topic. like she didn't fully understand what was required.

I am really disappointed with this writer as he didn't answer my messages, and after 2 days he told me to change the number of the pages for his own benefits, NOT RECOMMENDED AT ALL

the dead line was yasterday the writer ignore me .

Said that revised it but didn’t change anything

Very poor, no response from the writer

unable to have live chat with him.

The worst writer and the worst web nothing will be delivered as per you instructions

IF YOU CANNOT DO IT, THEN DO NOT ACCEPT THE OFFER IN THE FIRST PLACE, TRASH WRITER

Sorry, just not what I am looking for in an art history paper.